Trinity Framework 2.0

Terminology Reference


Introduction

Trinity Framework 2.0 Core uses standardized terminology to ensure clear communication and context resilience across agent systems. This reference document defines the standard terms used throughout the framework, with a focus on project-based terminology that replaces temporal references.

Project-Based Terminology

Trinity Framework 2.0 replaces time-based references with project-based terminology to ensure context resilience. This mapping provides a standardized way to refer to operational cycles and project segments.

Temporal Term Project Term Definition Typical Duration
Daily UNIT Atomic operational cycle 1 rotation
Weekly MILESTONE Achievement checkpoint 7 units
Biweekly ITERATION Process improvement cycle 14 units
Monthly PHASE Major project segment 4 milestones
Quarterly PROJECT Complete initiative 3 phases

Core Framework Terminology

Agent Types

  • APEX: Strategic direction and architecture agent
  • ANALYST: Data analysis and optimization agent
  • HISTORIAN: Documentation and knowledge management agent

Protocol Files

  • AGENT.md: Agent identity and role definition file
  • STATUS.md: Current operational status and priorities file
  • AUTO-COMPACT.md: Context management and recovery information file

System Components

  • AAR System: After Action Review documentation system for learning and context preservation
  • Context Management System: Optional system for tracking and visualizing context utilization
  • Protocol-Based Recovery: Standardized recovery mechanism for context resets
  • Workspace Standardization: Consistent file structure and organization

Context Management Terminology

Context States

  • Utilization: Percentage of context window currently in use
  • Checkpoint: Serialized state snapshot for recovery
  • Threshold: Defined utilization level triggering actions
  • Auto-Compact: Context reset process to clear window

Threshold Levels

  • Notice (65%): First level threshold creating checkpoint
  • Warning (75%): Second level threshold with caution notification
  • Alert (85%): Critical threshold offering auto-compact

Operation Types

User Messages

  • USER_SMALL: Brief messages (~750 tokens)
  • USER_MEDIUM: Standard messages (~2200 tokens)
  • USER_LARGE: Detailed messages (~4400 tokens)

Assistant Responses

  • ASSISTANT_SMALL: Brief responses (~1500 tokens)
  • ASSISTANT_MEDIUM: Standard responses (~4400 tokens)
  • ASSISTANT_LARGE: Detailed responses (~10000 tokens)

Tool Operations

  • TOOL_READ_SMALL: Small file reads (~1500 tokens)
  • TOOL_READ_MEDIUM: Medium file reads (~4400 tokens)
  • TOOL_READ_LARGE: Large file reads (~7500 tokens)
  • TOOL_WRITE: File writing operations (~750 tokens)
  • TOOL_EDIT: File editing operations (~1500 tokens)
  • TOOL_TASK: Task tool executions (~6000 tokens)

Workspace Terminology

Directory Structure

  • /AAR/: After Action Review documentation
  • /projects/: Active project implementation files
  • /reports/: Generated reports and documentation
  • /archives/: Archived implementation artifacts
  • /tools/: Utility scripts and tools
  • /checkpoints/: Context recovery checkpoints

File Naming Conventions

  • Protocol Files: UPPERCASE-WITH-HYPHENS.md
  • Session AARs: YYYY-MM-DD-description.md
  • Incident AARs: DESCRIPTIVE-NAME-RCA.md
  • Scripts: verb-noun.sh or verb-noun.js

Recovery Terminology

Recovery States

  • Recognition: Identification of context reset
  • Identity Restoration: Regaining agent identity
  • Context Loading: Retrieving implementation context
  • Work Resumption: Continuing operations with recovered context

Recovery Metrics

  • Recovery Time: Exchanges needed for full operational awareness
  • Context Retention: Percentage of knowledge preserved across resets
  • Recovery Completeness: Degree of state restoration

Success Metrics Terminology

  • Recovery Time: ≤1.0 exchanges to full operational awareness
  • Context Retention: ≥90% knowledge preservation across resets
  • Response Time: ≤500ms for standard operations
  • Task Completion: ≥95% successful completion rate
  • Protocol Compliance: 100% on critical requirements

Conclusion

This terminology reference provides a standardized vocabulary for working with Trinity Framework 2.0 Core. Consistent use of these terms ensures clear communication, effective documentation, and operational resilience across context limitations.


Framework 2.0 COMPLIANT